<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Researchers: Prosthetic legs give Pistorius unfair advantage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2009/11/19/pistorius-researc-25641/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2009/11/19/pistorius-researc-25641/</link>
	<description>Disability News &#124; PatriciaEBauer.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:58:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2009/11/19/pistorius-researc-25641/comment-page-1/#comment-5284</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=25641#comment-5284</guid>
		<description>Wow. How ironic is it that someone with a disability is now considered to have a greater ability than a non-disabled person? Does this mean that there should be a separate Olympics, called the &quot;Super Olympics,&quot; so that all persons wearing prosthetics can participate? Perhaps the rules might  state that every runner must wear identical prosthetic legs to have the same &quot;fair advantage.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. How ironic is it that someone with a disability is now considered to have a greater ability than a non-disabled person? Does this mean that there should be a separate Olympics, called the &#8220;Super Olympics,&#8221; so that all persons wearing prosthetics can participate? Perhaps the rules might  state that every runner must wear identical prosthetic legs to have the same &#8220;fair advantage.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Ingersoll</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2009/11/19/pistorius-researc-25641/comment-page-1/#comment-5178</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Ingersoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 05:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=25641#comment-5178</guid>
		<description>Technology is advancing quicker than society can keep up: we’ve reached a time when an individual with a prosthetic arm or leg can function better then a non-disabled person, yet still--ironically--be viewed with pity.  Will prostheses eventually go the way of glasses—accommodating so completely that their users are no longer considered “disabled” by society? This hypothetical (but entirely possible) future would be appreciated, I think, by people who lose their limbs later in life due to injury or accident.  Where, though, would it leave those who choose not to use prostheses (in particular, people who are born without a limb and simply adapt to their condition, in many cases, reaching full or virtually full functionality)?  If technology is viewed as a “solution” to disability--a solution that makes the disabled body appear and operate as a non-disabled body--where does that leave those who do not see their physical difference as a defect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology is advancing quicker than society can keep up: we’ve reached a time when an individual with a prosthetic arm or leg can function better then a non-disabled person, yet still&#8211;ironically&#8211;be viewed with pity.  Will prostheses eventually go the way of glasses—accommodating so completely that their users are no longer considered “disabled” by society? This hypothetical (but entirely possible) future would be appreciated, I think, by people who lose their limbs later in life due to injury or accident.  Where, though, would it leave those who choose not to use prostheses (in particular, people who are born without a limb and simply adapt to their condition, in many cases, reaching full or virtually full functionality)?  If technology is viewed as a “solution” to disability&#8211;a solution that makes the disabled body appear and operate as a non-disabled body&#8211;where does that leave those who do not see their physical difference as a defect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Burnett</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2009/11/19/pistorius-researc-25641/comment-page-1/#comment-5105</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Burnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=25641#comment-5105</guid>
		<description>As technology advances, the controversy of prosthetic use will undoubtedly become more of an issue. Where will the line be drawn between what is seen as an acceptable prosthetic and what is seen as one that gives an athlete an unfair advantage? We live in a society regulated by the Americans with Disabilities Act which states that disabled people are allowed the same rights as nondisabled. However, when the time comes when people with prosthetics surpass nondisabled athletes, the ADA will certainly be questioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As technology advances, the controversy of prosthetic use will undoubtedly become more of an issue. Where will the line be drawn between what is seen as an acceptable prosthetic and what is seen as one that gives an athlete an unfair advantage? We live in a society regulated by the Americans with Disabilities Act which states that disabled people are allowed the same rights as nondisabled. However, when the time comes when people with prosthetics surpass nondisabled athletes, the ADA will certainly be questioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
