Disability news, Accessibility Issues, Disability Issues, Accessiblity News

Sequenom DS detection rate no longer perfect

February 1st, 2009

From the San Diego Union-Tribune and San Diego Business Journal, Thestreet.com:

Genetic testing company Sequenom disclosed new testing data this week showing that its non-invasive prenatal test for Down syndrome no longer has a perfect record for accuracy.

After assessing 858 pregnant women, the test resulted in one false positive, while correctly detecting 28 cases of Down syndrome and delivering no false negatives. Previously, the first-trimester blood test had delivered results of 100 percent detection with no false positives and no false negatives.

Sequenom officials are touting their test as superior and safer than current screening methods and diagnostic tests, and predict it will capture a large share of the estimated $2 billion-a-year prenatal testing market.

See also:

‘Sequenom is a rule breaker’ — Motley Fool

Leave a Reply

Comment

Please copy the string EuGuPT to the field below:

 
`

About the Site

More than 50 million people in the United States have disabilities, a number that is growing rapidly as the population ages. Experts say disability will soon affect the lives of most Americans. This website attempts to aggregate news and commentary about disability, and to document the efforts of people who are seeking new ways to address familiar challenges.

Join journalist Patricia E. Bauer as she seeks to bring you the best information about what's happening now and what it may mean for you and your loved ones.

Read More »

Search

Categories

Read More »

Not2BeMissed

Read More »

Entertainment

Read More »

School Restraints

Read More »

Prenatal Diagnosis

Read More »

Obama Administration

Read More »

My Articles & Essays

Read More »

FAQs

 

Headlines

Read More »

News2Use

Read More »

Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list!





RSS Our RSS Feed



Archives
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007