Disability news, Accessibility Issues, Disability Issues, Accessiblity News

Does Obama plan target special needs trusts?

October 25th, 2008

From the Wall Street Journal:

In her speech yesterday, Sarah Palin said Barack Obama’s tax plan would raise taxes on special needs trusts. These trusts are legal arrangements which allow parents to put aside assets for their adult disabled children without jeopardizing their children’s eligibility for government benefits.

Andy Imparato, president of the American Association of People with Disabilities, a nonpartisan nonprofit, says he has not heard any complaints from constituents about how the Obama tax plan would affect them.

“It’s my understanding that he’d raise taxes on anyone making more than $250,000. That doesn’t seem to single out parents of disabled children,” he says.

See also: Six things to know about a special needs trust — AP/Forbes

One Response to “Does Obama plan target special needs trusts?”

  1. Sue Swenson Says:

    So, Andy got this almost right. Many families making $250,000 or more would see no change, so that’s important — not everyone would see an increase. Even more important, an expert analysis [see editor's note below] posted with this WSJ article says that people who use a special needs trust would actually be better off under Obama:

    “Senator McCain’s campaign’s claim that Senator Obama’s plan will raise taxes on special needs trusts is misleading. I am an estate planning/elder law attorney in Ohio who is very familiar with the taxation of special needs trusts. There are two types of these trusts. The first is a trust which is created with the disabled individual’s assets, e.g. an inheritance or a personal injury settlement. If properly drafted, the trust is exempt from Medicaid and Supplemental Social Security Income (SSI). The income and assets can be used for the disabled person’s needs which are not covered by those governmental programs. This trust is typically a “grantor” trust, meaning that the income is taxed to the disabled individual, and not the trust. I would venture to say that there are very few disabled individuals with income in excess of $250,000. The typical disabled individual would actually benefit from Senator Obama’s tax plan.

    “The second type of “special needs trust” is a trust created by a third party, such as the disabled person’s parents. That type of trust could conceivably pay more taxes under the Obama plan since the trust is taxed on income retained in trust. However, any distributions from the trust to or for the benefit of the disabled individual would carry out income to that individual and be taxed at his or her rates. Once again, through proper tax planning, the overall result to the family would be better under the Obama plan. — Douglas M. Toot, OH”

    [Editor's note: The quotes above attributed to Douglas M. Toot are included in a comment on the Wall Street Journal article. That comment is posted here.

Leave a Reply

Comment

Please copy the string 4W5yQv to the field below:

`

About the Site

More than 50 million people in the United States have disabilities, a number that is growing rapidly as the population ages. Experts say disability will soon affect the lives of most Americans. This website attempts to aggregate news and commentary about disability, and to document the efforts of people who are seeking new ways to address familiar challenges.

Join journalist Patricia E. Bauer as she seeks to bring you the best information about what's happening now and what it may meanĀ for you and your loved ones.

Read More »

Search

Categories

Read More »

Not2BeMissed

Read More »

Entertainment

Read More »

School Restraints

Read More »

Prenatal Diagnosis

Read More »

Obama Administration

Read More »

My Articles & Essays

Read More »

FAQs

 

Headlines

Read More »

News2Use

Read More »

Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list!





RSS Our RSS Feed



Archives
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007