<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientists promise &#8216;safer&#8217; prenatal test for Down syndrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/10/06/stanford-down-syndrome-test-3393/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/10/06/stanford-down-syndrome-test-3393/</link>
	<description>Disability News &#124; PatriciaEBauer.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:50:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/10/06/stanford-down-syndrome-test-3393/comment-page-1/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=3393#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>The test is not the problem so much as the narrow minded patients and their equally narrow minded healthcare providers who both lack sufficient current info on DS. I hope to see the newly enacted K-B Bill change in that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The test is not the problem so much as the narrow minded patients and their equally narrow minded healthcare providers who both lack sufficient current info on DS. I hope to see the newly enacted K-B Bill change in that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Ratkiewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/10/06/stanford-down-syndrome-test-3393/comment-page-1/#comment-2859</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Ratkiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=3393#comment-2859</guid>
		<description>Oh, I know that prenatal testing, in and of itself, is not always bad. In the best case scenerio, if a problem is detected, parents can have time to educate themselves, prepare for the child&#039;s birth, or plan for medical interventions for the baby if needed. The fact of the matter, though, is that prenatal screening for Ds results in a 90% abortion rate. The enthusiasm about the newest test is because too many &#039;normal&#039; babies were being lost due to miscarriage after amniocentesis. The new test is more accurate, so it is &#039;safer&#039; for everyone...except, of course, for most of the  babies w/Ds who are diagnosed prenatally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I know that prenatal testing, in and of itself, is not always bad. In the best case scenerio, if a problem is detected, parents can have time to educate themselves, prepare for the child&#8217;s birth, or plan for medical interventions for the baby if needed. The fact of the matter, though, is that prenatal screening for Ds results in a 90% abortion rate. The enthusiasm about the newest test is because too many &#8216;normal&#8217; babies were being lost due to miscarriage after amniocentesis. The new test is more accurate, so it is &#8216;safer&#8217; for everyone&#8230;except, of course, for most of the  babies w/Ds who are diagnosed prenatally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/10/06/stanford-down-syndrome-test-3393/comment-page-1/#comment-2857</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=3393#comment-2857</guid>
		<description>@Heather,

Unfortunately, that most often is not the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Heather,</p>
<p>Unfortunately, that most often is not the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/10/06/stanford-down-syndrome-test-3393/comment-page-1/#comment-2853</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=3393#comment-2853</guid>
		<description>Prenatal testing is not always a search and destroy mission for parents.  Sometimes they just want to know what&#039;s coming down the pike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prenatal testing is not always a search and destroy mission for parents.  Sometimes they just want to know what&#8217;s coming down the pike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/10/06/stanford-down-syndrome-test-3393/comment-page-1/#comment-2849</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=3393#comment-2849</guid>
		<description>This is both sad and scary.

It&#039;s ironic that Stanford has received a great deal of money for Down syndrome research.

I hope this isn&#039;t how they spent it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is both sad and scary.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ironic that Stanford has received a great deal of money for Down syndrome research.</p>
<p>I hope this isn&#8217;t how they spent it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Ratkiewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/10/06/stanford-down-syndrome-test-3393/comment-page-1/#comment-2848</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Ratkiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=3393#comment-2848</guid>
		<description>Safe? Who are they kidding? Oh, I get it...nobody &#039;normal&#039; will be harmed by the test.

Sorry, but I can&#039;t get excited about the &#039;safety&#039; of this test since it is primarily a search and destroy mission for unborn babies with Down syndrome.

Wonder why the abortion of babies with Down syndrome is not seen as a &#039;disability hate crime&#039;? Why isn&#039;t developing tests to specifically target unborn babies with Down syndrome for destruction targeted as a disability hate crime&#039;? They are being targeted for abortion on the basis of disability, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safe? Who are they kidding? Oh, I get it&#8230;nobody &#8216;normal&#8217; will be harmed by the test.</p>
<p>Sorry, but I can&#8217;t get excited about the &#8216;safety&#8217; of this test since it is primarily a search and destroy mission for unborn babies with Down syndrome.</p>
<p>Wonder why the abortion of babies with Down syndrome is not seen as a &#8216;disability hate crime&#8217;? Why isn&#8217;t developing tests to specifically target unborn babies with Down syndrome for destruction targeted as a disability hate crime&#8217;? They are being targeted for abortion on the basis of disability, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

