Op-ed: Let’s change our focus regarding Down syndrome
October 3rd, 2008Writing in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, David M. Perry says he had hoped that Trig Palin’s presence in the limelight might bring hope to families of children with disabilities. Instead, he says, the national conversation has focused on Sarah Palin’s decision not to have an abortion — a focus that isn’t helpful to families of kids with disabilities, nor to expectant parents who are fearful about disability.
Choosing life is not about what happens in utero, but about what follows. Choosing life is about knowledge. It’s about training doctors and nurses how to talk to expectant parents. Most of all, it’s about providing an antidote to fear by changing the perception of disability. That’s where Trig’s voice, even before he learns to talk, needs to be heard. But his voice is being drowned out by the partisan hubbub of people from both parties who are focused on the single issue of abortion. Let’s change, or at least expand, the message.
What I want is a serious national conversation about raising children with disabilities — the way that government, schools, churches, doctors, HMOs, and most of all friends and families can help us.
… Let’s talk about the federal mandates that order, but do not fund, early intervention. Let’s talk about universal health care and special education. Let’s talk about how to help our children find meaningful lives as adults. Most of all, let’s talk about ways to ensure that everyone sees people with Down syndrome as, first and foremost, just people. Then we can get to work on the syndrome.
David M. Perry is the father of a 2-year-old boy with Down syndrome and an assistant professor of history at Dominican University in River Forest, Ill.



October 6th, 2008 at 9:25 am
That’s very true, and that’s where community comes into play. Respite care. Friends. Extended family. That’s a big part of the support network making it all possible.
October 5th, 2008 at 8:10 pm
True. Just don’t forget to have a life. Whether your son’s disabling condition(s) are mild or complex, he is still a child to love and not a project to complete.
October 5th, 2008 at 3:25 pm
Hello,
I’m the author of the op-ed (and guilty of googling myself to see reactions).
Necessary is a complicated word. Nicholas would survive and be quite happy, probably learn to walk and talk in time, and otherwise be fine without these therapies. Then again, my son’s disabilities are relatively mild compared to many of his peers.
But early intervention therapy, it’s been shown, can lead to a vastly better prognosis for his life in so many ways — communication, strength, motor control, intelligence (I think I saw a figure that therapies can raise IQ 10-20 points, if you put stock in IQ numbers), social interaction, and so forth.
In that context, although you are right that it is exhausting, how could we do anything but get him into as many programs as seems appropriate for him?
October 3rd, 2008 at 10:57 pm
Inside this article is the following from the author: “My wife, son and I belong to three or four support groups, have four early intervention therapies a week in our home, go to a weekly group therapy and are about to start aquatic therapy.” How exhausting! It this kind of therapy drill necessary?