<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Column: Palin using her child as political prop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/09/17/macarthur-palin-prop-3231/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/09/17/macarthur-palin-prop-3231/</link>
	<description>Disability News &#124; PatriciaEBauer.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:50:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/09/17/macarthur-palin-prop-3231/comment-page-1/#comment-2696</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=3231#comment-2696</guid>
		<description>I fear this man is so angry about so many things and he is frustrated and stressed. We have all been mad at some time or the other about the treatment of our children by schools, the government, other people etc. Nobody can fault him for that or fault him for not believing a particular candidate.

I think what has everyone upset is that, in addition to these things, he also comes across as  disrespectful to special needs individuals. He sounds like he is ashamed of his situation and mad that he has to deal with it. He calls his child his special-ed daughter, he has her in a separate non-inclusive school, he says &quot;Down syndrome baby&quot; rather than a child with Down syndrome  and he talks of the suffering such a child brings.

I feel this man has not allowed himself to know what joy any child (yes, even one with a disability) can bring to one&#039;s life. I think he needs counseling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fear this man is so angry about so many things and he is frustrated and stressed. We have all been mad at some time or the other about the treatment of our children by schools, the government, other people etc. Nobody can fault him for that or fault him for not believing a particular candidate.</p>
<p>I think what has everyone upset is that, in addition to these things, he also comes across as  disrespectful to special needs individuals. He sounds like he is ashamed of his situation and mad that he has to deal with it. He calls his child his special-ed daughter, he has her in a separate non-inclusive school, he says &#8220;Down syndrome baby&#8221; rather than a child with Down syndrome  and he talks of the suffering such a child brings.</p>
<p>I feel this man has not allowed himself to know what joy any child (yes, even one with a disability) can bring to one&#8217;s life. I think he needs counseling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/09/17/macarthur-palin-prop-3231/comment-page-1/#comment-2691</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=3231#comment-2691</guid>
		<description>I have a couple of thoughts is this article.

1. If Trig Palin didn&#039;t have Down syndrome, would he be considered a political prop?  He was there because he is part of the Palin family.  I can only imagine the commentary if they chose to keep him away from the convention and/or cameras.

2. He nor anyone else is a Down syndrome baby.  He is a baby who has Down syndrome.

3. I hope the author doesn&#039;t introduce his daughter to anyone as his &quot;special ed daughter.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a couple of thoughts is this article.</p>
<p>1. If Trig Palin didn&#8217;t have Down syndrome, would he be considered a political prop?  He was there because he is part of the Palin family.  I can only imagine the commentary if they chose to keep him away from the convention and/or cameras.</p>
<p>2. He nor anyone else is a Down syndrome baby.  He is a baby who has Down syndrome.</p>
<p>3. I hope the author doesn&#8217;t introduce his daughter to anyone as his &#8220;special ed daughter.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Ratkiewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/09/17/macarthur-palin-prop-3231/comment-page-1/#comment-2690</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Ratkiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=3231#comment-2690</guid>
		<description>What a hate filled article. I do not need his sympathy...maybe he &#039;suffers&#039; as a result of having a daughter with special needs, but I do not suffer as a result of having a child with Down syndrome. 

It sickens me that someone could look at Trig Palin and only see a &#039;thing&#039; that should have been aborted.

Maybe the reason that people condemn the Palins for having Trig on stage with them is that the very idea of being proud of your child w/Down syndrome is so foreign to them? It was and is very obvious that the Palin family is totally in love with Trig, and it is the most natural thing in the world that he would be with them at the RNC.

When we are urged to write our Representatives about funding for government programs, we are often told to relate some story about why the funding is important to us...to our child..why is that not seen as using our children as political props? Why are other candidate&#039;s children not being singled out as political props? Is it just because Trig has Down syndrome, and presumably, shouldn&#039;t even have been allowed to be born? 

Whatever happens in November, only the most biased person can fail to see that Sarah Palin has already done a lot to increase Down syndrome awareness just by showing everyone that life doesn&#039;t stop, and families are not torn apart due to having a child with Ds. It is obvious that his sisters love Trig as well. It is sad that people with an agenda are being so harsh in their comments about this family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a hate filled article. I do not need his sympathy&#8230;maybe he &#8216;suffers&#8217; as a result of having a daughter with special needs, but I do not suffer as a result of having a child with Down syndrome. </p>
<p>It sickens me that someone could look at Trig Palin and only see a &#8216;thing&#8217; that should have been aborted.</p>
<p>Maybe the reason that people condemn the Palins for having Trig on stage with them is that the very idea of being proud of your child w/Down syndrome is so foreign to them? It was and is very obvious that the Palin family is totally in love with Trig, and it is the most natural thing in the world that he would be with them at the RNC.</p>
<p>When we are urged to write our Representatives about funding for government programs, we are often told to relate some story about why the funding is important to us&#8230;to our child..why is that not seen as using our children as political props? Why are other candidate&#8217;s children not being singled out as political props? Is it just because Trig has Down syndrome, and presumably, shouldn&#8217;t even have been allowed to be born? </p>
<p>Whatever happens in November, only the most biased person can fail to see that Sarah Palin has already done a lot to increase Down syndrome awareness just by showing everyone that life doesn&#8217;t stop, and families are not torn apart due to having a child with Ds. It is obvious that his sisters love Trig as well. It is sad that people with an agenda are being so harsh in their comments about this family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/09/17/macarthur-palin-prop-3231/comment-page-1/#comment-2687</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=3231#comment-2687</guid>
		<description>Mr. MacArthur uses sympathy for parents of children with special needs as an excuse for a nasty attack on Sarah Palin.  In the full article he assumes two women he knew who had children with Down Syndrome could not possibly be  Republicans.  He didn&#039;t even bother to speak to the parents.  He also uses out of date language to refer to baby Trig.  Mr. MacArthur seems to have done no research for this article.  Instead he just let his venom spew forth.   I&#039;m shocked that a magazine publisher could be so unprofessional and lazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. MacArthur uses sympathy for parents of children with special needs as an excuse for a nasty attack on Sarah Palin.  In the full article he assumes two women he knew who had children with Down Syndrome could not possibly be  Republicans.  He didn&#8217;t even bother to speak to the parents.  He also uses out of date language to refer to baby Trig.  Mr. MacArthur seems to have done no research for this article.  Instead he just let his venom spew forth.   I&#8217;m shocked that a magazine publisher could be so unprofessional and lazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

