<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palins tell &#8216;People&#8217; about life with baby Trig</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/08/30/gop-ticket-people-qa-3053/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/08/30/gop-ticket-people-qa-3053/</link>
	<description>Disability News &#124; PatriciaEBauer.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:58:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Renate</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/08/30/gop-ticket-people-qa-3053/comment-page-1/#comment-2399</link>
		<dc:creator>Renate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=3053#comment-2399</guid>
		<description>It is always hard to see whose rights Conservatives protect: those of the most vulnerable, or the least vulnerable. With a remark like &#039;I was grateful to have those months to prepare&#039; my guess would be the latter. Makers of prenatal tests (like Sequenom) regard women that refuse testing on moral, religious or other grounds a major risk to unbridled profits. 

As a mother of two children with Down syndrome (both my biological children) I can add: my first pregnancy, without screening was bliss because I only focused on becoming a mom. My second pregnancy, after screening, was less than bliss because I found myself constantly explaining, defending, why I did not terminate my pregnancy.

I can imagine many women, who aren&#039;t lucky to already know the joys of parenting a child with Down syndrome, cannot withstand the pressure put on by society, health providers and even &#039;friends&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is always hard to see whose rights Conservatives protect: those of the most vulnerable, or the least vulnerable. With a remark like &#8216;I was grateful to have those months to prepare&#8217; my guess would be the latter. Makers of prenatal tests (like Sequenom) regard women that refuse testing on moral, religious or other grounds a major risk to unbridled profits. </p>
<p>As a mother of two children with Down syndrome (both my biological children) I can add: my first pregnancy, without screening was bliss because I only focused on becoming a mom. My second pregnancy, after screening, was less than bliss because I found myself constantly explaining, defending, why I did not terminate my pregnancy.</p>
<p>I can imagine many women, who aren&#8217;t lucky to already know the joys of parenting a child with Down syndrome, cannot withstand the pressure put on by society, health providers and even &#8216;friends&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
