<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Author: &#8216;Medical genetics is not eugenics&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/05/15/author-medical-genetics-is-not-eugenics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/05/15/author-medical-genetics-is-not-eugenics/</link>
	<description>Disability News &#124; PatriciaEBauer.com</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terri</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/05/15/author-medical-genetics-is-not-eugenics/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 12:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=2129#comment-897</guid>
		<description>The evidence that using genetics to eliminate "devastating diseases" and "overwhelming disabilities" takes us down a slippery slope is shown because the same techniques are being used to eliminate Down syndrome which is NEITHER.

Eliminating most of a population does endanger everyone who is left and this is demonstrated with thalassemia (and any other condition that gets eliminated pre-birth) because the efforts toward cure, effective treatment and amelioration of symptoms slows to a standstill -- the money gets spent on elimination rather than research (and all of the information learned during the research that would benefit other conditions/diseases is also prevented.)

What if the physicians that got to Cyprus first were outstanding hematologists instead of geneticists? Would the world have advanced in the understanding and treatment of blood disorders and dyscrasias? Instead we study the effects of eliminating certain people on an island .... which, frankly, we could learn watching Survivor. Yuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The evidence that using genetics to eliminate &#8220;devastating diseases&#8221; and &#8220;overwhelming disabilities&#8221; takes us down a slippery slope is shown because the same techniques are being used to eliminate Down syndrome which is NEITHER.</p>
<p>Eliminating most of a population does endanger everyone who is left and this is demonstrated with thalassemia (and any other condition that gets eliminated pre-birth) because the efforts toward cure, effective treatment and amelioration of symptoms slows to a standstill &#8212; the money gets spent on elimination rather than research (and all of the information learned during the research that would benefit other conditions/diseases is also prevented.)</p>
<p>What if the physicians that got to Cyprus first were outstanding hematologists instead of geneticists? Would the world have advanced in the understanding and treatment of blood disorders and dyscrasias? Instead we study the effects of eliminating certain people on an island &#8230;. which, frankly, we could learn watching Survivor. Yuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Iannone</title>
		<link>http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/05/15/author-medical-genetics-is-not-eugenics/#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Iannone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriciaebauer.com/?p=2129#comment-895</guid>
		<description>University of Pennsylvania, huh? They diagnosed my child, offered me an abortion several times, and gave me NO information about Down syndrome. But it’s not eugenics. Right. I guess I should have told them in advance that I would not terminate. Oh, wait, I did that. Maybe I should have been clear and firm. Oh, wait, I was.

You can all it whatever you want -- politically right, moral, whatever - but so long as disabilities are misunderstood, inaccurate or little information is given, and termination is pushed -- it is a specific targeting of a population for elimination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>University of Pennsylvania, huh? They diagnosed my child, offered me an abortion several times, and gave me NO information about Down syndrome. But it’s not eugenics. Right. I guess I should have told them in advance that I would not terminate. Oh, wait, I did that. Maybe I should have been clear and firm. Oh, wait, I was.</p>
<p>You can all it whatever you want &#8212; politically right, moral, whatever - but so long as disabilities are misunderstood, inaccurate or little information is given, and termination is pushed &#8212; it is a specific targeting of a population for elimination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
